Justia – a comprehensive resource for federal and state statutory laws, and also case law at both the federal and state levels.
A guide to online and print sources of Washington State court opinions, rules, forms, and jury instructions
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. five/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI forty six SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have heard the realized counsel for that parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments given that the issues in the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard on the interim relief application in terms of Section 7(one) of the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 to hand over possession of your subjected premises to the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to get decided because of the competent court after hearing the parties if pending as the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer from the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court needs to see this element for interim custody of the topic premises if the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order.
Also, it could review an appeal of a decision for which it's granted certification. In addition to its legal authority, the Court holds limited political authority. It will review and finalize a decision by The brand new Jersey Redistricting Commission on redistricting congressional districts Should the Commission cannot arrive at a decision.
This is because transfer orders are typically thought of within the administrative discretion of your employer. However, there could possibly be exceptions in cases where the transfer is enthusiastic by malice, personal vendetta, or discrimination against the employee, they may have grounds to challenge before the appropriate forum. Read more
Civil Courts keep jurisdiction over title disputes in partition matters. Agreement to sell does not confer title; it necessitates legal transfer of title. Agreement to sell must be developed and properly exhibited in evidence. Declining relief based on an unproduced and un-exhibited sale agreement is legally unsustainable. Read more
27 . Const. P. 4002/2011 (D.B.) Ibrahim Noor V/S Pakistan International Airlines Corporation & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi Even, if a petitioner was acquitted in a criminal case following a conviction, in NAB Reference No. twenty/2011, this does not automatically bring about exoneration from departmental charges based on the same factual grounds. Though a writ under Article 199 is offered in specific limited situations, it's generally not the right remedy to contest a dismissal from service based on these charges, particularly when the employee was afforded a full chance to cross-look at witnesses and present his/her defense but didn't persuade the department of his/her innocence.
In federal or multi-jurisdictional regulation systems there may possibly exist conflicts between the different decreased appellate courts. Sometimes these differences will not be resolved, and it could be necessary to distinguish how the legislation is applied in one district, province, division or appellate department.
On June 16, 1999, a lawsuit was filed on behalf with the boy by a guardian advertisement litem, against DCFS, the social worker, along with the therapist. A similar lawsuit was also filed on behalf of the Roe’s victimized son by a different guardian ad litem. The defendants petitioned the trial court for any dismissal based on absolute immunity, since they were all acting in their jobs with DCFS.
Summaries offer concise explanations of legal principles and significant cases pertaining to land ownership, real estate transactions, property rights, and related matters, assisting you in understanding the intricacies of land and property regulation.
This page contains slip opinions. Slip opinions are classified as the opinions that are filed within the day that the appellate court issues its decision and will often be not the court's final opinion.
Summaries of cases that shape the lives of younger individuals, making sure a deeper understanding of justice within the juvenile system. Knowledge that matters, crafted for legal professionals and fanatics alike.
seventeen . Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI forty six I have read the figured out counsel for that parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments given that the issues in the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard to the interim relief application in terms of Section 7(one) of your Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 at hand over possession of the subjected premises into the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs being decided with the competent court after hearing the parties if pending since the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer while in the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court must see this element for interim custody of the subject premises if the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within click here two months from the date of receipt of this order. Read more
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming for the main case, It is additionally a perfectly-established proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence in the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty with the charge, however, that is subject matter into the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings around the evidence.